Hotmail
|
|
|
|
|
All reviews by user Date  Helpful Rating 0 out of 0 users found this helpful  James Rocchi is a wanna b criticPosted: 6/24/2009A review of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen by MEGAPISSED8 James Rocchi needs to be fired!
it's one thing to bash a movie because he hates BAY and that is why he is.
but he spoils the movie by telling us what happens to one of the transformer robots
without a spoiler alert in sight!
This is a major crime for any critic to do and he should be fired for it.
he knows better then this and it seperates the great critics from the rookie critics who should know better. in his biased review he gives away a major plot point which happens and that is something some people could sew over and i just might for ruining the movie for me and others.
it don't matter if you like it or not,you have no right to give away what happens!
i'd smack his ass down if he were in front of me right now for doing so.
he needs to be fired.
he even thinks the first transformer movie was utter crap?!?!?!?
did he not see the same flick? for a transformer movie about robots?
it was a kickass flick made very well and formed nice!
great story,a fun ride with great characters you got to know!
it was ten times better then independence day and stands up there for a great flick!
you know he has no clue what he's talking about if he trashed the first one,it was tight! and killer and a movie with high replay value!
i think he simply hates bay and will trash anything he makes.
this movie looks killer just like the first one.
never the less i know it will be good. this guy needs to be fired. period.
or beat up!
what a loser. Was this review helpful? Sign In 1 out of 2 users found this helpful  REMAKEnotRETHINKPosted: 12/13/2008A review of The Day the Earth Stood Still by WAKEUPHOLLYWIERDOS If your going to remake it remake it and don't go out of bounds to what the original was,if anything all you needed was better special effects (although the original still holds up today) and basicly have the same story with maybe a few more added ideas,not ruin it. you should never remake a classic or a 4-5 star film.
if it's not broke u don't fix it! unless the movie calls for better special effects like KING KONG needed. if anything they should simply not remake films and simply re-release them in theaters again for all to enjoy on the silver screen and guess what?
people will come and would rather enjoy the original then these remakes.
so far? most remakes have not been better and come off as a cheap husstle.
they simply changed way too much about this classic that people should protest!
i would of rather seen the original again on the big screen,u don't need to remake all movies for gods sakes to show people what we missed,believe it or not,people rent them but would enjoy them again in theaters again for a new generation.
movies like white heat.. flight of the phoenix with james stewart,even the original HARVEY! gone with the wind... ect.. if u simply put them back in the theaters?
people would pay for them again even if they own them just to see them on the big screen. they did it for star wars when lucas revamp the effects and added scenes in.
no more remakes... next disapointment? creature from the black lagoon is coming. although to see it in color would be nice? i fear they will screw it up bad story wize. Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 2 users found this helpful not another tween vampire moviePosted: 11/21/2008A review of Twilight by RealityChecker101 crap,crap,crap,mega crap.
even lost boys 2 tribes was better.
tween vampire movies made by nobdoys who can't act never work or
can be taken seriously. it's a movie that only tweens can be fooled by
and like fools,they will be.
even when it chokes,they will find some hidden insanity to say it was killer!!!
keep dreaming,those fangs were not even sharp.
try bram stokers dracula for a better flick that has yet to be beat.
wait for video Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful  what a crockhave not seen this yet but it should be decent coming from the guy who did wolf creek, should be better then primevil,but even that movie was not better then lake placid,which i liked. but one crock movie blows them all away so far which is, black water! i doubt rouge will be better then this one but it's way better then lake placid.
more real and based on a true story,of course over done a tad,but still a scary movie. intence.. suspence! you just don't know when the crock is gonna pop up and bite your head. good acting and effects. some errry scenes and gore.
you'll like black water! it's the best crock movie i have seen so far,lake placid comes next... unless this movie is good. i'll see soon when netflicks gets it's head out of it's ... yeah. they are slow and have limited copies.
PS: i hear this movie is not too bad,is why i wanna see it.
but check out black water,it's worth your time. kinda intence,and in the dark?
scary. crock looks real and is in some scenes. Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful THE MUMMY 3 ROCKS!!Posted: 8/1/2008A review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor by the-daily-news-critic don't listen to msn reviewers.. this movie is awesome!!
entertainment 101!!!
fun and exciting and interesting!
get past the point of no Rachel Weisz and u are on your way.
hey she was too pompous to come back,forget her then!
what has she done for us lately?
she should of jumped all over this one,it rocks!!!!
her mistake! this movie is rolls and never stops!
at least the other characters are back and that is why it works.
i always liked the brother as the comedy relief guy and he does his job well as usual!
it's a different run this time and it feels like it! exciting and fun!!!!!
didn't squirm in my seat and didn't expect much but was not disapointed!!!!
hell,they didn't like xfiles movie too,but it was killer too!!!
what is wrong with msn?? trying to sabotauge movies for kicks????
this one is just as good as the others but of course not as perfect!
just another adventure and i hope there is more,and why not?
they are fun movies! break out the popcorn and have fun,don't go in all anal like these reviewers and expect wonders! and disect it to death. it's fiction people!!!!
ya gotta simple go in believing in the film,it's not suppose to be real or reality!
it's a great movie!!!! loved it and will go see it again!!!!!!
4 stars all the way.. would of gotten five had,Rachel Weisz been there!
shame on her!!!!!!!!! boo! boo!!! BOO!!!!!!
the movies that made her name and she didn't like the script?
i would think mummy 2 was more far fetched then this one,with her so called past life?
nefertiti or whatever???
i think she didn't want to do that one as well,but they some how talked her into it!
what else can she do that people would pay to see??? shes in a main role here at least with rick! and she shines.. she ruined everything.. at her age,she shouldn't be so chosey! the nerve of her. i for one do not like her for this.
she was made for the role and it did damper it a tad. Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful I Believe,You should too!!Posted: 7/25/2008A review of The X-Files: I Want to Believe by AlienXpert These two low budgit reviewers at msn don't know movies anymore,of course a movie documentary about sum idiot who walks across the world trade center gets 5 stars...lol talk about dull.
This new xfile movie is meant to be another episode,nothing more or less,just bigger and longer and better,bringing back mulder and scully,mainly for the fans who cry for it! they won't be bringing back the tv series,which is a shame,i felt it still had alot of life left into it! and what else can the actors do now that would sell? or keep them in the limelight? they are mulder and scully forever. although david has had good luck doing californication and other comedeys. he is a funny guy too and good at that.
but he belongs here,and so does scully aka Anderson!
This movie was fun and entertaining and simply a joy to see them together again!
great story,new and fresh and worth wild!
i didn't feel like i wasted my money! it's that great!!
don't miss this little gem,you will regret listening to idiot reviewers who get off on documentarys but not fiction.
this is xfiles. just as if they brought it back to tv and we got a wonderful 2 hour episode but well above tv standards. just as good as the first xfiles movie if not better!!!
nothing bad about this film at all!
didn't squirm in my seat from boredum at all!
it flys and it's interesting and exciting! i'm glad they came back to do it and hope they bring out more!! i'll be paying to see it again,while i can!
can't believe some of these old farts reviewing movies... maybe it is they who should call it quits,because they lost it!
imagination and what we go to see movies for!
it's not reality! it's pure entertainment!
4 stars by far,and at least!!
mulder and scully are back is worth 3 stars alone!
some reviewers need to be canned!
I went in thinking it wouldn't be as good as the first film,but was wrong.
i loved it from start to finish.. i believe! you should too!!!!!!!!!!! Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful Wonderful world of PixarHome Run!
But i still wish pixar would make a sequel (even if they hate doing them)
of "CARS" and perhaps a 3rd installment of Toy story!
People want more from lightning mcqueen and tow mater!
ya gotta make the sequels!
maybe this time lightning can win the big piston cup!
Wall-E is great, but i favor cars and toy story before it! Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful Crap,Crap,Crap,Mega Crap.Posted: 6/27/2008A review of Wanted by OLAN-HOLLYWOOD Shooting wings off flys?
Curving bullets with a flick of the wrist?
a tad bit over board!
why not call the movie shoot em up part 2?
these insane movies make me vomit,like mr. and mrs smith and i can't believe these people would even like this non believable flick!
i don't mind jolie,when she shows some body,but her male counterpart in this one is just annoying and ugly. didn't make a good pair.
over the top and not worth 3 stars by far.
replay value? not more then indiana jones or iron man or hulk.
but they give this flick and even higher review???
talk about kissing up!
this one is video fodder.
the fact jolie is not getting naked for me is really pissing off my night.
we have seen it before babe,we just wanna see more before you get old.
show me the honey! Was this review helpful? Sign In 5 out of 5 users found this helpful INCREDIBLEPosted: 6/13/2008A review of The Incredible Hulk by MOVIEPROS People are sentimental,always want the original actors to play the parts they started.
in most cases,this would be true. like indiana jones or chris reeves as superman.
in the case of the hulk,eric bana had no right to even accept the role,he simply didn't fit the bill,nor did he put any effort into the role!
let's face it,bill bixbie will always be the real banner in most peoples eyes,and ed norton fits the bill right next to bixbie. even looks like him sum and is about the same build. bana phoned in the role and i hated him as bruce.
the tv series made hulk more full circle.
this time they are revamping it and doing it right!
comic books are a bit over the edge,the tv series made it more belieable
and u couldn't wait for the next time banner's eyes changed and what made him change.
this time they do it right. the eyes always go first!
unlike lee's feeble way.
this is not a sequel it's doing it the way it should of been done.
i totally aprove of norton being banner he fits the role and is a way better actor then bana! bana is too stupid looking to even be considered a scientists or doctor.
blackhawk down,was his only role i liked him in.
if they stuck to the comics only,this would be a joke.
the tv series is what made it full circle and even stan lee has said this!
trust me folks. this movie gets 4 stars all the way from start to finish
and wait till u see the end!!!!!!!!!
this movie brings back memories!
even bill bixbie woulod aprove!
forget the first huilk flop!
this is the one we wanted!
don't listen to sentimental fools!
This is how it should of been from day one!
norton is WAYYYYYYYYYYYYY Better for the role of banner,wake up u fools who think sentimental! this is a revamp! like batman begins.. they did it right. and they did it right here!!! Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful  Crap,Crap,Crap,Mega Crap.Posted: 8/3/2007A review of The Bourne Ultimatum by Reality702 If he's not making oceans 16 he falls back on this,anything else with this actor wont sell. i can't believe people buy into this crap.
he never could carry his own films. good will hunting only showed his ego.
he has a face of a bully that nobody likes,he reminds me of the fat kid from indiana jones and the last crusade,at the start,the fat boyscout who is young indys sidekick.
same face. i just hate it. don't like this guy for sum reason other then his muggy face.
all these movies are is a copy of other films we already seen with non believable stunts,over done.
there will be a part 4 too,since he can't sell any other film,unless he's a sidekick with some other bigger actor.
it's obvious why he made another. what else would you fools pay for?
i think this is the end of his job as an actor. if ya have to fall back on the same old movie....
he's like butch from the little rascals... just annoying.
go away,ugly man. =) Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful Ok,not much story.Posted: 8/1/2007A review of 300 by Reality702 They like it for the gore alone. which is all the movie is about.
you barely get to know any characters and it's just fighting.
the CGI was not too real. over done.
still a good movie for those who like carnage and for those with egos and no brains.
won't match up to braveheart or lord of the rings,where it tried to copy in so many ways.
it needed more... so much more,yet was a welcome movie to see.
better then gladiator by far and less boring.
just not much story. just a silly CGI war and predictable.
pretty good acting,nice images. just needed more war and story.
perhaps a sequel should be done on past wars they had....
still a great movie. just not as great as kids will obviously say simply for gore alone.
fake gore at that. should of been less cgi blood. looked like freddy versus jason style,fakeness...
3 stars at the very least and most. Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful  A GREAT MONSTER MOVIEPosted: 7/28/2007A review of The Host by Reality702 Turned out to be a great flick.
thought the cgi would look stupid,i was wrong.
plus the monster was original and moved original and was kinda scary.
you couldn't predict the end,as i thought i would.
it was simply a great monster flick.
a sequel is already in the planning and i just hope they can pull it off as good as the first.
be nice to see an american version of this with even better effects,but the effects were great as was the story and directing. shots and the monster itself.
it was not all about the monster itself and ya got to know the characters and felt for them....
the next day i couldn't stop and help thinking about how good a movie i had just watched lastnight. i loved it.
rent it... buy it.... wait for the sequel,which i doubt will be as good as this one is.
the way it was made was right on cue.
it is one of the best monster movies to date.
5 stars for surprizing me.... Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful STOP BLOWING MOVIE ENDINGS ONLINEPosted: 7/21/2007A review of Premonition by Reality702 would u dumb women stop blowing the movie ending?
is it too much trouble for your feeble minds?
kate you need to be thrown in a trash compactor,you twit!
do u know what spoilers mean????
use your small women brain.
just tell us what u thought of the movie,don't give out details,you jafo.
this goes for all u other DlCKS. Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful Sandy is an idiotPosted: 6/19/2007A review of Bridge to Terabithia by Reality702 SANDY? could ya not come on here and blow the movie ending for everyone,like the twit suzie home maker u are? next time use the word,SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
you dumb founded idiot blonde.
there is a difference between giving a review and giving the stoyline away,u fool on earth!
you would have to be as dumb as a rock to give anything away,let alone in your first sentence. you are one dumb women. Was this review helpful? Sign In 0 out of 0 users found this helpful FANTASTIC!!!!!!!!!!Posted: 6/17/2007A review of Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer by Reality702 it's a movie about a comic book and cartoon. lighten up!
these films will never win an oscar and don't want one!
it's fun and entertaning and how can u not love the charccters we already know.
the first film simply introduced them and did a great job!
ya gotta think of these films as comic books brought to life.
thats it.
ben grimm being my favorite is done to a T' he looks like he is just in the comics and cartoons! casting was perfect for our heroes.
the more they make the better as i feel the same for spiderman or spuerman movies.
they are always fun. i dont nitpick. no need,like this so called prifessional reviewer.
he's an old guy who wants a too serious and real film.
forget it!
movies based on comics book brought to life are what the people wnat right now.
and need. keep bringing us these super hero movies.
sometimes they may not be great? but good enough like any other comic book
some are better then others. this movie hits the nail on the head as it did the first time out.
fun.. entertaining. no thinking required... it's whnat movies are about. make believe.
i hope they make a fantastic 4,part 3!!!!!!!
they stayed true to the comic book and cartoons!
just perfect! Was this review helpful? Sign In |
||
